New! Listen to Concept to Cloud - Real stories from the trenches of software engineering
The Great LLM Bake Off
Research

The Great LLM Bake Off

TB
Tom Barber
September 29, 2026
8 min read

Eight models, one prompt, one screenshot: rebuild the Superhuman UI in SvelteKit. Four free models, four paid ones, and the cost per attempt ranging from nothing to $1.18.

So I had an itch to scratch over the weekend. We have been playing around with free and alternative models here at Concept to Cloud, and as it was a Friday night I fancied poking at some of them myself, after some less than flattering feedback from my colleagues.

So I decided to run a simple bake off. I didn’t want it to be too in-depth, or anything you’d expect to see in a whitepaper. I wanted it quick, dirty, and roughly like something I might do on any other night in Claude Code, in the same spirit as rebuilding Saiku with AI agents.

Four free models and four paid ones, all asked to rebuild the Superhuman UI in SvelteKit in a one-prompt showdown.

The prompt, through OpenRouter and Pi, was deliberately simple:

using sveltekit, the supplied image and any assets you need to fetch or create rebuild the Superhuman UI and launch it so we can evaluate what you build. Do not ask questions instead use your best inference to work out what needs to be built. More points for interactivity, authenticity and features.

Plus a screenshot of the real thing.

One note on the screenshots below. The image I handed the models was of my own inbox, and several of them faithfully reproduced what they could read in it. Those message lists are blurred here, and a couple of the command palettes are cropped, because the names and subject lines in them belong to people who did not sign up to appear on my blog. Where a model invented its own dummy inbox, which two of them did, you are seeing it untouched.

Nemotron 3 Ultra

You’d think a model from Nvidia, free or not, would be good. Well, Nemotron, despite all the token spend, I can tell is firmly in the “not” camp. The slowest by a mile. This was supposed to be one shot, and I had to take pity on it and fix it, because the version out of the box didn’t even compile.

Nemotron 3 Ultra's attempt at the Superhuman UI: a dark three-pane mail client with a left sidebar, a message list, and a labels section. The model invented its own placeholder inbox rather than copying the supplied screenshot.

A closer look at Nemotron's message list, with invented contacts and category labels down the left-hand side.

For anyone who has seen the Superhuman UI, you know very much that this, well, isn’t what it looks like.

poolside/laguna-s-2.1:free

Didn’t compile. Seemingly too many people experimenting with it on a Friday night. Which is its own small lesson, and the reason we tell clients to plan for the model being down. Let’s move on.

inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-fin:free

Not amazing, not the worst. Took the screenshot and distilled it into something passing as the UI.

Ling 3.0's attempt: a light two-pane layout with a message list on the left and an open message on the right. Like Nemotron, it generated its own placeholder inbox rather than reproducing the supplied one.

The output from the LLM told me some of the buttons worked as Superhuman-style shortcuts. They didn’t.

stealth/space-bunny-alpha

I’m sure we’ll find out where this model came from in the next few days. There are a few competing ideas online. My guess is it’s another Chinese model. It performed quickly and was pretty good.

Space Bunny Alpha's attempt: a faithful three-pane layout with a tabbed inbox, a dense message list, and a contact detail pane on the right. The message list is blurred.

This time I even got a command palette, out of the box, no extra prompting.

Space Bunny Alpha's command palette: a search field over a long list of commands including Go to Inbox, Snooze conversation, Archive conversation and Compose with AI, each with its keyboard shortcut.

I felt this was a good model. Well tuned, knew what to build, and outside of a few tweaks performed very well.

Will it be free much longer? Ha, hell no.

And so endeth the free models

So this was supposed to be the end of the test. Four quick runs: the top three ranked free models on OpenRouter, plus the stealth one. We had one terrible attempt, one no-show, one average result, and the much improved but not-really-representative space-bunny-alpha.

But then I thought, fuck it, it’s Friday. So I decided to spend some hard-earned credits on the same test with the paid models. Not the ones from OpenAI and Anthropic, because we all know what the output from them would be like.

Of course, this time I had another variable to account for. Cost.

z-ai/glm-5.3-flash

This model I think did pretty well.

GLM 5.3 Flash's attempt: a wide, information-dense inbox with a compact message list and a right-hand detail pane. The message list is blurred.

The screen out of the box looked good. And we got a popup menu.

GLM's command palette: a compact list with Go to Inbox, Compose new email, Search email, Go to Shared, Go to Calendar and Keyboard shortcuts.

The performance was pretty good, and of course we then look at the cost of all this. Which obviously includes setting up a project from scratch, building it, and so on. Cost: 3 cents. Not bad!

deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash

Next up we had DeepSeek. I had high hopes, I’d heard good things.

DeepSeek v4.1 Flash's attempt: a clean inbox with grouped date headers and a right-hand reading pane. The message list is blurred.

Again, good output, looks about right, nothing super out of place.

DeepSeek's command palette, grouped into Actions, Navigate and View, with shortcuts alongside each command.

Also got the command palette. Looks pretty similar to space-bunny-alpha, no?

All of this cost 10x more than GLM though: 30 cents. Still not bad value for money, I don’t believe.

xiaomi/mimi-v2.6-flash

Next up we have Mimi.

Mimi v2.6 Flash's attempt: slightly chunkier window chrome and a roomier message list than the others. The message list is blurred.

This time we had some slightly different window chrome, a little more chunky output. Again got a pretty good looking command palette. Don’t forget all these command palettes come from its own knowledge, and likely the shortcut tip at the bottom that was in my prompt screenshot.

Mimi's command palette, grouped into Go To, Actions, View and Sidekick, the last offering to summarise the inbox or draft a reply.

Not a bad attempt, probably the weakest of the three so far in my opinion. But how much did it cost? A whopping 22 cents.

tencent/hy4-preview

Last up we have hy4-preview from Tencent. I do like the output here, I think it’s pretty realistic.

Tencent hy4-preview's attempt: the closest to the real thing, with tabbed navigation, a dense message list and a contact pane carrying relationship notes. The message list is blurred.

I may go as far as saying it was my favorite of the bunch, but there is a catch at the end. Again, standard command palette, looks good out of the box.

Tencent's command palette, with a search-commands-and-conversations field over Go to Important, Go to Shared, Go to Calendar, Compose new email and Toggle preview panel.

What’s the problem, you say? Well, I’ll tell you. It’s the price. This cost a whopping $1.18, which is the most by an absolute mile. Of course, if you were just using the model to rip off UIs or leverage existing designs this may be money well spent, but for me, considering what you get for 3 cents with GLM, this is an astronomical uplift.

So what does this tell us?

Not much? Well, I joke a little, but still not a great deal. It was a casual experiment into the ability of an LLM to build a UI it has likely trained on and also has a screenshot of.

It wasn’t supposed to be that in-depth, or that thorough. But I do think it tells you one thing: you get what you pay for. When comparing free and paid models it’s very clear. What you don’t see is that once you hit the paid models the difference between them is all marginal. Which is the same point as not all AI is created equal, arrived at from the cheap end: the interesting question is rarely which model, it is what you are asking it to do and what happens when it is unavailable or degraded. It depends on how much you care, what you’re looking for, and what you’re trying to achieve.

ModelFreeCostVerdict
Nemotron 3 UltraYesNothingSlowest, didn’t compile
poolside/laguna-s-2.1YesNothingNo show
inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-finYesNothingPassable, shortcuts didn’t work
stealth/space-bunny-alphaYesNothingGood, command palette out of the box
z-ai/glm-5.3-flashNo3cGood, and the value pick
deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flashNo30cGood, 10x the price of GLM
xiaomi/mimi-v2.6-flashNo22cWeakest of the paid four
tencent/hy4-previewNo$1.18My favourite, and 39x the price of GLM

If you are weighing models for something that has to hold up in production rather than survive a Friday night, that is the work we do: AI and data systems built so the model is a component you can swap, not the foundation you are betting on.

TB
Written by Tom Barber

Ex-NASA engineer and cloud architect with over a decade of experience building scalable systems for startups and enterprises.

Work with Tom →

Concept to Cloud

Product and technology insight from those who deal with it daily. Fortnightly, no hype, unsubscribe anytime.

Related Articles

You Are Probably Paying for the Wrong AI Model
Research

You Are Probably Paying for the Wrong AI Model

We split building a product into eleven jobs and tested free and paid models against each one. For most of them, the free model is good enough. Here is where paying is worth it, and where it never is.

Read More →
Anthropic's Bun Acquisition: Why AI Giants Are Moving Down the Stack
Strategy

Anthropic's Bun Acquisition: Why AI Giants Are Moving Down the Stack

Anthropic's acquisition of Bun isn't just another dev tool purchase, it's a signal that AI companies are done relying on external infrastructure. When you own the model, the dev tools, and the runtime, you control the entire coding experience.

Read More →
Plan for the Model Being Down
Strategy

Plan for the Model Being Down

Claude, ChatGPT and Grok all went offline at roughly the same time. If AI sits at the core of your product, availability is a design problem, not a vendor problem.

Read More →

Ready to Build Your Product?

Let's discuss how we can help you bring your vision to life with expert cloud solutions

Get Started