Technical Due Diligence & Value Creation for PE | Concept to Cloud
New! Listen to Concept to Cloud - Real stories from the trenches of software engineering
Technical diligence and value creation for private equity

We find the risk in the technology
then build the systems that create the value.

Senior engineers who de-risk the tech behind your thesis and ship the platforms your portfolio companies run on. NASA-grade reliability, assessment before pitch, value measured the way your board measures it.

Built for NASA, DARPA and a global compliance advisory · 20+ years of regulated-industry delivery · Assessment-first, always

Currently booking discovery calls

180×
faster pipelines delivered
(NASA PIXL, Mars 2020)
74%
lower processing cost
on the same workload
20+
financial institutions live
on a platform we built
$0
technical debt handed to
your team at exit

Outcomes we have reported, not promised. Every engagement ends with a system your team owns.

From thesis to value

The technology is usually the risk nobody priced.

Most mid-market portfolio companies run on systems held together by a few key people and a decade of shortcuts. The value-creation plan assumes the tech will keep up. Often it cannot, and that surfaces after close, not before. We close that gap from both ends: a clear-eyed technical read before you commit, and senior engineers who modernise and ship after you do.

01 · Diligence

Know what you are buying.

A technical read of the platform, team, and failure modes. Board-ready in two weeks. You keep the analysis even if the deal does not close.

02 · Modernise and build

Make it hold.

Strangler-fig migrations, new platforms, AI in production. Phased delivery, milestone reviews, zero-downtime cutover.

03 · Handover

Value that outlasts us.

Documented, tested, owned by your team at exit. No lock-in, no dependency on us, no C2C hooks in the platform.

One team, two buyers

We speak to the operating partner and the operator, and connect them.

The operating partner needs a defensible read on risk and a value case. The operator needs systems their team can actually run. We do both, and we do not hand either one slideware.

For operating partners

De-risk the deal, then move the value plan.

  • ·Pre-deal or post-close technical diligence, scored by risk and cost
  • ·A lighthouse modernisation shipped on hold-period timelines
  • ·Reliability discipline that protects the number at exit
  • ·Direct access to senior builders. No layered staffing
2 wk to board-ready read NASA-grade failure-mode discipline

For portfolio operators and data leaders

Ship production systems your team owns.

  • ·Senior engineers embedded, not a rotating bench
  • ·Agentic AI and data platforms running in production, not demos
  • ·Full handover. Code, docs, infrastructure, training
  • ·Stack chosen for your roadmap, not our partnership tier
20+ institutions on one platform we built 8-12 wk idea to production

Productised, so you can buy with confidence

Four ways in. Each starts with a technical read.

No open-ended discovery. No surprise at the board meeting. Start with a two-week diligence read, or commit to a full modernisation.

01 · Technical Read

Know the risk before you commit.

2 weeks · $15K-$25K

A senior read of the platform, team, and failure modes. Pre-deal or post-close. Risk map, cost drivers, and a quantified remediation plan. Board-ready. You keep the analysis even if we do not do the build, and if we do, the Read fee is credited in full against it.

Explore the Read
02 · Modernise and Build

From assessment to production.

3-6 months · $120K-$500K

A senior pod modernises the platform and ships the new capabilities. Phased delivery, milestone reviews, zero-downtime cutover. Full documentation and handover built in.

Explore Modernise
03 · New Product or MVP

Idea to shipped product, price locked.

8-12 weeks · fixed, from $40K (10-day scoping from $8K)

For portfolio companies launching something new. Scope and price fixed before a line of code. Production in weeks, your team owns everything at handover.

Explore MVP development
04 · Fractional Engineering Leadership

Director-level leadership without the hire.

Monthly · $12K-$25K / mo

Technical strategy, team building, delivery discipline, and vendor management for a portfolio company that has the headcount but not the leadership.

Explore Leadership

How an engagement runs

From read to shipped, with a checkpoint at every phase.

Days 1-10

Read

Platform, team, and failure-mode audit. Risk and cost quantified. Board-ready.

Weeks 2-6

Architect

Target architecture, migration plan, guardrails. Nothing built until the plan survives scrutiny.

Weeks 6-14

Build and cut over

Pipelines, platforms, and AI to production. Zero-downtime migration. Monitoring in place.

Handover

Own it

Documentation, paired work, training. Your team runs it the day we leave. Or we stay on. Your call.

Why firms choose us

Six reasons, one engineering standard.

01

Reliability for the highest stakes

Every system ships with a tested answer for how it breaks and how you recover. Before go-live. The same discipline that built infrastructure for NASA missions, where there was no second deploy.

02

Diligence before pitch

Every engagement opens with a technical read, never a packaged proposal. You walk away with a usable analysis even if we are not the team to build it.

03

AI inside the hard systems

Most firms ship AI demos. We built agentic AI into a sanctions-compliance platform live across 20+ financial institutions. Leverage inside production rigour, not outside it.

04

Built to be handed over

Documentation, paired work, and training are scheduled into the engagement. Your team owns the system at exit. No lock-in dressed up as a retainer.

05

Stack chosen, not preferred

AWS, Azure, GCP. Polars and Spark. Postgres and DAPR. No vendor allegiance at the table, so architecture serves your roadmap, not our partnership tier.

06

Patterns across regulated domains

Aerospace, fintech, pharma, research. Failure modes rhyme even when the systems do not. Your build inherits a decade of lessons from places where reliability was already the rule.

"Absolutely critical as an engineering leader. A partner, collaborator, and leader."

Chris Mattmann

Former C-Suite Aerospace Executive · AI/ML Expert

"Tom and his team came in and transformed the highly manual Excel work into a flexible, dynamic piece of software."

Head of Product

Global financial-crime compliance advisory

Questions PE firms ask first

The honest answers before you commit.

How is a pre-deal Technical Read different from post-close diligence?

Same discipline, different clock. Pre-deal is compressed to 10 business days so it fits inside a diligence window, focuses on risk that changes the price you pay, and produces a memo your team can put in front of an IC. Post-close is the same read with more access to the internals and a longer horizon on the remediation plan. The point of doing it pre-deal is that some of what we find is worth walking away from, or repricing over.

Can we run the Technical Read alongside the commercial or legal DD teams?

Yes, and we prefer it. We plug into the existing DD workflow, take briefings from the deal team, and hand back a read that lines up with the risk register commercial and legal are building. Most partners we work with route us data-room access and one engineering-side call and let us go.

Do you take equity or performance fees in place of cash?

No. Everything is fixed fee or milestone-billed against a written plan. That keeps the incentives aligned with your fund and your LPs, and it keeps the read honest. If a deal is not worth doing, we tell you, and getting paid for the read is what makes that answer costless to give.

What size portfolio company does this actually fit?

Lower and middle market. We are the wrong team for a $2B revenue platform that already has a 200-engineer team; they need to hire, not engage a boutique. We are the right team for a $10M-$250M revenue portfolio company where the technology is core to the thesis but the engineering org is small, brittle, or run by one person who left last quarter.

Do you specialise in a vertical, or are you horizontal engineering?

Horizontal engineering, with vertical scars. Aerospace, fintech, regulated compliance, healthcare data, scientific research. The reason we get called into regulated portcos is that reliability and audit trail engineering translate between industries even when the domain vocabulary does not.

What happens when we exit?

Nothing that we control. Everything we build ships with documentation, tests, runbooks, and cloud accounts under your portco's control. Your operating team, a strategic buyer's team, or the next PE owner picks it up on day one. There is no C2C dependency in the platform at exit. That is the whole design.

Are you US-based? Where does the team sit?

Alexandria, Virginia, in the DC metro. Tom is US-based. The senior bench is US and UK. No offshore staffing on your engagements; the people who write the read are the people who run the build.

Start with a read

Let us find where the risk and the value actually is.

Thirty minutes with a senior engineer. Send a few lines about the company, the platform, or the deal. We will write back honestly about whether we are the right team. If we are not, we will point you to someone who is.

Book a technical read

No pitch deck. No sales funnel. Real engineering talk. Tom reads every brief.